Habitat suitability is a poor proxy for landscape connectivity during dispersal and mating movements
By A. Keeley, Paul Beier, Brian W Keeley, Matthew E. Fagan. 2017
156 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6eaf27ebe72ebea22d607a3015ad9e57fd7d7c03
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- K. Zeller
- Samuel A. Cushman
- Paul Beier
- Brett G. Dickson
- David M. Theobald
- John Novembre
- Joshua J. Lawler
- J. Fargione
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Joshua J. Lawler
- Samuel A. Cushman
- K. Zeller
- Caitlin E. Littlefield
- David M. Theobald
- J. Fargione
- Paul Beier
- K. McGarigal
Citations in the corpus
- Are all data types and connectivity models created equal? Validating common connectivity approaches with dispersal data (2018, result): “These results agree with those found by Fattebert et al. (2015), Keeley et al. (2016) and Keeley et al. (2017) for leopards, desert bighorn sheep and kinkajous, respectively, and Newby (2011) for pumas.”
- Circuit‐theory applications to connectivity science and conservation (2018, background): “Circuit theory is particularly appropriate when the assumption of moving individuals having limited knowledge of the surrounding landscape is met (McClure et al. 2016; Keeley et al. 2017; Maiorano et al. 2017).”