Consequences of clonal growth for plant mating

By A. Charpentier. Evolutionary Ecology, 2001

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e9b587af41f1f7e38bdc8cbbdd4d47cec640007

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Molecular Biology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

The Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Clonality for Plant Mating (2010, background): “The notion that clonality has negative consequences for female and male components of fertility has received considerable attention (Charpentier 2002, Honnay & Jacquemyn 2008), but we still have little data on the magnitude of these costs or on how clone size and architecture influence these costs.”
Pollen Limitation of Plant Reproduction: Pattern and Process (2005, background): “As a result, we expect species with the capacity for asexual reproduction to evolve lower levels of resource allocation to floral traits and pollinator attraction than their exclusively sexual counterparts (Charpentier 2001, Ronsheim & Bever 2000).”
Reproductive Biology of Cactaceae (2010, background): “Similarly, the aggregation of ramets can result in higher floral display in one genet and the attraction of a higher number of pollinators who carry pollen of other genets ( Charpentier 2002 ).”
Standardizing methods to address clonality in population studies (2007, background): “…relevant to screen for the occurrence of clonally mediated dispersal (e.g. by means of fragmentation, dispersal and re-establishment), which can be an additional efficient source of dispersal susceptible to significantly affect the genetic neighbourhood (Charpentier 2001; Hammerli & Reusch 2003).”
Death without sex—the ‘problem of the small’ and selection for reproductive economy in flowering plants (2008, background): “Hence, the view that clonality may interfere with sexual reproduction by reducing the probability of out-cross pollen transfer (Cook 1983; Handel 1985; Charpentier 2001 ), may in some respects, be putting the ‘cart’ before the ‘horse’.”
Genetic diversity patterns in Phragmites australis at the population, regional and continental scales (2008, background): “…in the form of harvesting, may affect the genetic structure and diversity of P. australis populations as it indirectly creates opportunities for the seedling establishment, modifies the clonal architecture of populations, and affects the mating and dispersal opportunities (Charpentier, 2002).”
Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in an agricultural landscape on the common Primula veris, and comparison with its rare congener, P. vulgaris (2004, background): “Clonal propagation can also contribute to microgeographical genetic structure and increase inbreeding (Charpentier 2002).”