A survey on provenance: What for? What form? What from?
By Melanie Herschel, Ralf Diestelkämper, Houssem Ben Lahmar. The VLDB journal, 2017
331 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e96b05fb6724b5eb6fc6e5b0717288d0ac93b39
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems
In Information Systems and Management
- Joshua A. Kroll
- Ben Shneiderman
- Peng Qi
- Nitin Kohli
- Ye Diana Wang
- Henry H. Emurian
- Meredith Ringel Morris
- Julia Schwarz
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- Bridging the Gap Between Ethics and Practice (2020, background): “Lessons from database systems [46] and information visualization [91] are useful.”
- This Thing Called Fairness (2019, background): “The scientific interest in fairness, transparency, accountability, explainability, and other values in computer science has advanced the state of theory as well as application, engaging cutting edge research in cryptography [84], formal languages [1], and systems [63, 118].”
- Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2021, background): “By tracking the data lineage at the highest resolution, data provenance can enhance the transparency, reproducibility, and accountability of an AI system [154, 172].”
- Participatory provenance as representational auditing for AI-mediated public consultation (2026, unknown): “…and lineage of data through processing pipelines, is well-established in database systems [Bune-man et al., 2001, Simmhan et al., 2005, Herschel et al., 2017], but has not been adapted to the specific challenge of tracking how individual citizen voices are transformed through…”