LYING PERSON‐TO‐PERSON ABOUT LIFE EVENTS: A COGNITIVE FRAMEWORK FOR LIE DETECTION

By Jeffrey J. Walczyk, J. Schwartz, R. Clifton, B. Adams, Min Wei, Peijia Zha. 2005

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e92faff49e2c91d546bcb1911514d31463d7f0d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Aldert Vrij
2. R. Fisher
3. Sharon Leal
4. Siegfried L. Sporer
5. Samantha Mann
6. B. Schwandt
7. Jeffrey J. Walczyk
8. Mark A. Runco

In Social Psychology

1. Aldert Vrij
2. R. Fisher
3. Sharon Leal
4. Samantha Mann
5. Siegfried L. Sporer
6. B. Schwandt
7. Jeffrey J. Walczyk
8. Mark A. Runco

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Aldert Vrij
2. Samantha Mann
3. Siegfried L. Sporer
4. B. Schwandt
5. R. Fisher
6. Sharon Leal
7. Maria Hartwig
8. Pär Anders Granhag

Citations in the corpus

• ‘Look into my eyes’: can an instruction to maintain eye contact facilitate lie detection? (2010, methodology): “They tested their model in a reaction time task and found that, in support of the model, liars responded significantly slower than truth tellers (Walczyk et al., 2003, 2005).”
• The Creativity of Lying: Divergent Thinking and Ideational Correlates of the Resolution of Social Dilemmas (2008, background): “Authentic lying such as was captured in the present dilemmas has been interpreted as a form of social problem solving with the aim of achieving specific interpersonal goals (Walczyk et al., 2003; Walczyk et al., 2005).”
• Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. (2007, background): “Although psycholinguistic theories (Goldman-Eisler, 1968) may provide a sound basis for predicting some paraverbal correlates of deception (Vrij, 2000; Walczyk et al., 2003, 2005), the link with nonverbal indicators is less clear.”
• Blinking During and After Lying (2008, background): “Finally, whereas activating the truth often happens automatically, activating a lie is more intentional and deliberate, and thus requires mental effort (Gilbert 1991; Walczyk et al. 2003, 2005).”
• Cognitive Lie Detection: Response Time and Consistency of Answers as Cues to Deception (2009, methodology): “Seeking to satisfy these requirements, Walczyk et al. (2005) recently proposed a cognitive lie detector, Time Restricted Integrity Confirmation (TRI-Con), which is based on the ADCM.”