Global platforms and ecosystems: Implications for international business theories

By Satish Nambisan, Shaker A. Zahra, Yadong Luo. Journal of International Business Studies, 2019

441 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e8624590bff085c6314b954ef93e159900f9a1c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Mike Wright
2. Maryann P. Feldman
3. Matteo Borghi
4. Marcello M. Mariani
5. Satish Nambisan
6. S. Newell

In Strategy and Management

1. Mike Wright
2. Maryann P. Feldman
3. Matteo Borghi
4. Marcello M. Mariani
5. Satish Nambisan
6. Mike W. Peng
7. K. Meyer
8. Donald S. Siegel

Citations in the corpus

• Platform Competition: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature (2020, neutral): “Relatedly, there are opportunities for applying an international business perspective to research on platforms and complementors (J. Li, Chen, Yi, Mao, & Liao, 2019; Nambisan, Zahra, & Luo, 2019).”
• The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes (2019, background): “For example, consider the growth and internationalization of platform-based digital ventures (Nambisan et al., 2019).”
• Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Review of Its Managerial Intellectual Structure and Potential Evolution in the Service Industries (2019, background): “Second, so far, no study has conducted an in-depth examination of the role of digital entrepreneurs as well as distributed agency in digital platforms and ecosystems (e.g., Eisenmann et al., 2011; Evans, 2003; Evans and Schmalensee, 2016; Hagiu, 2014; Nambisan, 2017; Nambisan et al., 2019; Parker an”