Company stock price reactions to the 2016 election shock: Trump, taxes, and trade
By Alexander F. Wagner, Richard J. Zeckhauser, Alexandre Ziegler. Journal of Financial Economics, 2018
226 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The election of Donald J. Trump as the 45th President of the United States of America on 11/8/2016 came as a surprise. Markets responded swiftly and decisively. This note investigates both the initial stock market reaction to the election, and the longer-term reaction through the end of 2016. We find that the individual stock price reactions to the election – that is, the market’s vote – reflect investor expectations on economic growth, taxes, and trade policy. Heavy industry and banking were relative winners, whereas healthcare, medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, textiles, and apparel were among the relative losers. High-beta stocks and companies with a hitherto high tax burden benefited from the election. Although internationally-oriented companies may profit under some plans of the new administration, several other arguments suggest a more favorable climate for domestically-oriented companies. Investors have found the domestic-favoring arguments to be stronger. While investors incorporated the expected consequences of the election for US growth and tax policy into prices relatively quickly, it took them more time to digest the consequences of shifts in trade policy on firms’ prospects.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e849a4349745a1402c9dd68421697048cca3065
Citations in the corpus
- Investor Rewards to Climate Responsibility: Stock-Price Responses to the Opposite Shocks of the 2016 and 2020 U.S. Elections (2021, unknown): “Shifts in investor expectations about other policy areas (such as Trump’s pledge to revive American manufacturing and his tough announced stance on trade) undoubtedly account for some of these industry-level returns (see Wagner et al. (2018) for a discussion).”