Planning for Biodiversity Conservation: Putting Conservation Science into Practice

By C. Groves, D. Jensen, Laura L. Valutis, K. Redford, M. Shaffer, J. M. Scott, Jeffrey V. Baumgartner, J. Higgins, M. Beck, Mark G Anderson. 2002

570 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e7c8607d4055b7eddda10173fedc730b516eb9a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Making conservation physiology relevant to policy makers and conservation practitioners (2010, background): “Both the fields of conservation science and physiological ecology have been the subject of change and redefinition in recent years (Somero 2000; Groves et al. 2002; Denver et al. 2009) with renewed interest in integration and understanding.”
Informed opportunism for conservation planning in the Solomon Islands (2011, background): “The challenge this presents is to reconcile bottom-up, community-driven conservation opportunities with The Nature Conservancy’s systematic and representation-based approach to prioritization (Groves et al. 2002).”
An Operational Model for Implementing Conservation Action (2006, background): “Existing operational models provide an important foundation for conservation planning (e.g., Margules & Pressey 2000; Groves et al. 2002); most, however, oversimplify the reality of real-world initiatives.”
How many endangered species are there in the United States (2005, background): “For this reason, many biologists have argued that the most efficient and effective approach to capturing biodiversity in a network of reserves is via a combined coarse–fine filter approach (Jenkins 1976, 1985; Noss and Cooperrider 1994; Groves et al. 2002).”
Conservation planning in a changing world. (2007, background): “Since its origin in the early 1980s, the field has influenced planning by major organizations such as The Nature Conservancy [ 2 ], shaped policy, legislation and conservation on the ground [3], and featured in almost 200 presentations at meetings of the Society for Conservation Biology.”
Biodiversity, Urban Areas, and Agriculture: Locating Priority Ecoregions for Conservation (2003, background): “International and regional NGO’s have increasingly developed approaches for coordinating these and other activities to maximize the overall benefit to local populations and communities (Groves et al. 2002, Sanderson et al. 2002, KambemToham et al. 2003).”
Habitat Restoration—Do We Know What We’re Doing? (2007, background): “This choice will maximize conservation benefits if it is made in the context of regional goals (Dale et al. 2000; Scott et al. 2001; Groves et al. 2002).”
The Last Mile: How to Sustain Long‐Distance Migration in Mammals (2004, background): “either ecological or life-history definitions of LDM may be estimated with allometric criteria to account for body size, my interest lies more in absolute rather than relative distance because conservation strategies have rarely, if ever, been based on relative measures of species size (Groves et al”
Predicting species distributions from herbarium collections: does climate bias in collection sampling influence model outcomes? (2007, background): “The identification of biologically diverse areas around the globe represents a critical step for systematic conservation planning (Margules & Pressey, 2000; Groves et al., 2002).”
Financial Costs and Shortfalls of Managing and Expanding Protected-Area Systems in Developing Countries (2004, background): “The other articles in this special section of BioScience, as well as important published work (e.g., Margules and Pressey 2000, Groves et al. 2002), address the issue of protected-area system coverage,providing evidence of key gaps in global protected-area systems as well as methodologies for…”
Marine biodiversity at the community level: zoogeography of sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras in the southwestern Atlantic (2010, background): “Important areas for conservation can be better designed based on the boundaries of biological communities rather than, for example, on an important area for a single species’ life cycle ( Groves et al. 2002; Primack 2006); in this way, a whole functioning ecosystem can be protected.”
Assessing threats to pool-breeding amphibian habitat in an urbanizing landscape (2009, background): “, 2002a), it is increasingly necessary to prioritize and triage among potential conservation actions (Groves et al., 2002).”
Difficult decisions: Strategies for conservation prioritization when taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity are not spatially congruent (2018, background): “Such multi-pronged approaches are becoming more common, and reflect the fact that conservation policy and management have multiple priorities and costs that need to be incorporated (Groves et al., 2002).”