Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes.
By L. Thibos, R. Applegate, J. Schwiegerling, Robert M. Webb. Journal of refractive surgery, 2002
849 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e71c63afa9960dc6e452f3ae2c8b20e2185ba88
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Srinivasan Parthasarathy
- Mark Bullimore
- Cynthia J. Roberts
- Michael D. Twa
- A. Mahmoud
- Thomas W. Raasch
- Christian Borgelt
- Mohammed J. Zaki
Citations in the corpus
- Automated Decision Tree Classification of Corneal Shape (2005, methodology): “for all Cn,m if n odd and m 0 → Cn,m (Cn,m) (1) where m angular frequency and n polynomial order according to Optical Society of America conventions.(19) Although Zernike polynomials are frequently used to represent the magnitude of optical wavefront aberrations of the eye, it is important to note t”