Photoperiod sensitivity after flowering and seed number determination in indeterminate soybean cultivars

By A. Kantolic, G. Slafer. 2001

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Fruiting efficiency: an alternative trait to further rise wheat yield (2015, background): “…(e.g., for barley: Miralles et al. 2000 ; Prystupa et al. 2004 ; Arisnabarreta and Miralles 2010 ; maize: Otegui and Bonhomme 1998 ; Vega et al. 2001 ; Rattalino Edreira and Otegui 2012 ; and soybean: Jiang and Egli 1995 ; Kantolic and Slafer 2001 , 2005 ; Egli 2010 ; Kantolic et al. 2013 ).”
Development, growth and yield of late-sown soybean in the southern Pampas (2003, background): “Third, a dramatic reduction in the relative duration of key phenostages which mostly resulted from reduced photoperiod (Ritchie and NeSmith, 1991; Mayor et al., 1975; Kantolic and Slafer, 2001).”
Physiological Determinants of Crop Growth and Yield in Maize, Sunflower and Soybean (2005, background): “This treatment hastens plant development because of higher temperatures during the vegetative period in the three crops (Major et al., 1975; Goyne et al., 1989; Cirilo and Andrade, 1994a) and shorter photoperiods during reproductive growth in soybean (Major et al., 1975; Kantolic and Slafer, 2001).”
Physiological and management factors contributing to soybean potential yield (2015, methodology): “Extending the photoperiod by 2 to 3 h using low-intensity lamps during the R1 to R3 period resulted in prolonged reproductive growth (R3 to R6) and large increases in both seed m−2 and yield (Kantolic and Slafer, 2001, 2007; Kantolic et al., 2013).”