A fast and high-quality charge model for the next generation general AMBER force field.
By Xibing He, V. H. Man, Wei Yang, Tai-Sung Lee, Junmei Wang. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2020
665 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The General AMBER Force Field (GAFF) has been broadly used by researchers all over the world to perform in silico simulations and modelings on diverse scientific topics, especially in the field of computer-aided drug design whose primary task is to accurately predict the affinity and selectivity of receptor-ligand binding. The atomic partial charges in GAFF and the second generation of GAFF (GAFF2) were originally developed with the quantum mechanics derived restrained electrostatic potential charge, but in practice, users usually adopt an efficient charge method, Austin Model 1-bond charge corrections (AM1-BCC), based on which, without expensive ab initio calculations, the atomic charges could be efficiently and conveniently obtained with the ANTECHAMBER module implemented in the AMBER software package. In this work, we developed a new set of BCC parameters specifically for GAFF2 using 442 neutral organic solutes covering diverse functional groups in aqueous solution. Compared to the original BCC parameter set, the new parameter set significantly reduced the mean unsigned error (MUE) of hydration free energies from 1.03 kcal/mol to 0.37 kcal/mol. More excitingly, this new AM1-BCC model also showed excellent performance in the solvation free energy (SFE) calculation on diverse solutes in various organic solvents across a range of different dielectric constants. In this large-scale test with totally 895 neutral organic solvent-solute systems, the new parameter set led to accurate SFE predictions with the MUE and the root-mean-square-error of 0.51 kcal/mol and 0.65 kcal/mol, respectively. This newly developed charge model, ABCG2, paved a promising path for the next generation GAFF development.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e4f1aad36333b3a17f15dcc2060a50adc35a577
Citations in the corpus
- Development and Benchmarking of Open Force Field 2.0.0: The Sage Small Molecule Force Field (2023, neutral): “…the recommended charge model for GAFF 2.11 is RESP, and others have indicated that GAFF 2.11/RESP often offers more accurate predictions than GAFF 2.11/AM1-BCC, 42 we find that AM1-BCC charges are a reasonable charge model with significantly lower computational expense than RESP for large data sets.”