Growth and yield of coffee plants in agroforestry and monoculture systems in Minas Gerais, Brazil

By M. M. Campanha, R. H. Santos, Gilberto Bernardo de Freitas, H. Martinez, S. Garcia, F. Finger. Agroforestry Systems, 2004

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Shaded Coffee and Cocoa : Double Dividend for Biodiversity and Small-scale Farmers (2017, background): “Even though this is often directly attributed to a decrease in solar radiation (Campanha et al., 2004; Vaast et al., 2006), there are increasing numbers of studies showing that moderate shade levels have little effect on cacao and coffee plant productivity (Perfecto et al.”
Effects of shade on growth, production and quality of coffee (COFFEA ARABICA) in Ethiopia (2011, result): “The reduced air temperature registered for coffee grown under shade was in agreement with the result obtained by (Campanha et al., 2005).”
Effects of Inga densiflora on the microclimate of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) and overall biomass under optimal growing conditions in Costa Rica (2010, unknown): “It is worth mentioning that for both systems the seasonal variation in LAI followed that of the soil moisture as reported by Matoso Campanha et al. (2004).”
Ecophysiology of coffee growth and production (2007, background): “…near-optimal edaphoclimatic conditions for coffee cultivation, such as those of the highlands (600-900 m above sea level) of southeastern Brazil, shading provides little, if any, benefit to the crop; in most cases it is even detrimental (Camargo, 1990; Campanha et al., 2004; Morais et al., 2006).”