The psychology of subjective well-being

By R. Biswas-Diener, E. Diener, Maya Tamir. Daedalus, 2004

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Dædalus Spring 2004 In the last few decades there has been something of a revolution in the scienti1⁄2c study of happiness.1 A combination of radical new thinking and sophisticated methodology has allowed psychologists to add substantially to our understanding of this concept that has historically been the domain of philosophers and theologians. For the 1⁄2rst time, we are able to measure happiness. And we have learned much about the biological and social factors that contribute to happiness. Perhaps just as important, we have debunked many myths about it– such as that young people are happy and the elderly are sad, or that money is the secret to it. Above all, we have begun to learn the lesson that happiness is more than an emotional pleasantry–that it is a psychological tonic that promotes well-being in many domains of life. The importance of using the scienti1⁄2c method in the study of happiness can be illustrated by referring to the work of Bertrand Russell, one of the greatest minds of the twentieth century. Russell, in his analysis of subjective well-being in The Conquest of Happiness, maintained that the majority of people are unhappy, in part because they compare themselves to others who appear superior to them. However, contemporary researchers have discovered that most people, at least in modern Western nations, consider themselves to be happy. FurtherRobert Biswas-Diener, Ed Diener

Subfields: Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e3721dc703778578b6969d7d0dffb9a3f7ed87d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

  1. Martin Pullinger
  2. Mike W. Martin
  3. Mario Pandelaere
  4. Liselot Hudders

Citations in the corpus