Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

By A. Babaev, P. Frederick, D. Pasta, N. Every, T. Sichrovsky, Judith Hochman. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2005

662 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (2014, background): “in the setting of acute myocardial infarction; the incidence in this population has remained fairly constant at between 6 and 9 %, over the past several decades [6, 22–25].”
Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction. (2017, neutral): “29 Mechanical ventilation Patients treated, n/n (%) 25/25 (100) 23/23 (100) Duration (days since device placement) 4 [3-13] 4 [2-8] 0.”
Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. (2006, background): “Early revascularization has been increasingly used in recent years in tertiary care centers, but only approximately 60% of those younger than 75 years received it in these select US centers in 2004.(1) Furthermore, the rate of transfer of patients with cardiogenic shock out of hospitals that cannot ”