An overview of sequential Monte Carlo methods for parameter estimation in general state-space models
By Nikolas Kantas, Arnaud Doucet, Sumeetpal S. Singh, Jan M. Maciejowski. 2009
312 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Control and Systems Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e3034091b86f0e8908b5e44c9556010fdee496c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Thomas Bo Schön
- Pierre E. Jacob
- Omiros Papaspiliopoulos
- Niklas Wahlstrom
- Marc Peter Deisenroth
- Nicolas Chopin
- Arnaud Doucet
- Sergey Levine
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Omiros Papaspiliopoulos
- Thomas Bo Schön
- Pierre E. Jacob
- Marc Peter Deisenroth
- Nicolas Chopin
- Eric Moulines
- Randal Douc
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Niklas Wahlstrom
- Thomas Bo Schön
- Marc Peter Deisenroth
- Nicolas Chopin
- Omiros Papaspiliopoulos
- Pierre E. Jacob
- Sergey Levine
- Jan Peters
Citations in the corpus
- Learning deep dynamical models from image pixels (2014, methodology): “ntication for the last decades [10, 17]. In recent years, sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) methods have received attention for identifying non-linear state-space models [15], see also the recent surveys [6]. While methods based on SMC are powerful, they are also computationally expensive. Learning non-l”
- Statistical inference for dynamical systems: A review (2012, unknown): “For an incomplete list of works concerning SMC and particle filtering, as well as their adaptations to parameter estimation, see [11, 24, 26, 32, 33, 34, 44, 60, 73, 85, 90, 100, 115].”
- SMC2: an efficient algorithm for sequential analysis of state space models (2011, methodology): “002), Storvik (2002), and also the more recent work of Carvalho et al. (2010), but numerical evidence seems to indicate these algorithms degenerate as well, albeit possibly at a slower rate; see e.g. Doucet et al. (2009). On the other hand, SMC2 is a generic approach which does not require such a sp”