Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry
By S. Borghesi, Giulio Cainelli, M. Mazzanti. 2015
541 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e1345adb6b427f23c2a3f4c67165b7f76d82860
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- J. Schleich
- D. Antonioli
- C. Lie
- C. Ghisetti
- Fulvio Castellacci
- S. Borghesi
- M. Mazzanti
- Karoline S. Rogge
In Marketing
- D. Antonioli
- C. Ghisetti
- M. Mazzanti
- Fulvio Castellacci
- C. Lie
- S. Borghesi
- Karoline S. Rogge
- J. Schleich
Citations in the corpus
- Does Environmental Regulation Indirectly Induce Upstream Innovation? New Evidence from India (2017, unknown): “This is supported by emerging empirical evidence from Italy on the role of policies, like emission trading scheme, on environmental innovation and transmission of innovation from manufacturing to services (Borghesi et al., 2015; Cainelli and Mazzanti, 2013).”
- Does the development of environmental innovation require different resources? Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms (2015, result): “Cooperation on green innovation activities with other firms or institutions (COOPERATION) and the acquisition of external knowledge in various forms (EXT-R&D and EQUIPMENT) have a marginal effect that is more than half, contrary to what was suggested, for example, by Borghesi et al. (2014) in the It”
- Innovation as a driver of eco‐innovation in the firm: An approach from the dynamic capabilities theory (2020, unknown): “Over recent years, eco-innovation (EI) has become an important driver of economic development (Ambec et al., 2013; Borghesi et al., 2015; Arena et al., 2017).”
- Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China (2017, background): “Among various environmental innovation variables, market supervision and governmental regulation are increasingly deemed to reduce carbon emissions in relevant studies (Foulon et al., 2002; Shimshack and Ward, 2008; Zhao et al., 2015; Borghesi et al., 2015).”
- A TAXONOMY OF GREEN INNOVATORS:EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SOUTH KOREA (2017, methodology): “On the other hand, Borghesi et al. (2015), using Italian survey data, find environmental policy to be more important than innovation policy support for both subtypes of eco-innovation, whereas R&D and innovation policy are not relevant for spurring energy-reducing and carbon dioxide-reducing…”
- Are regional systems greening the economy? Local spillovers, green innovations and firms’ economic performances (2016, methodology): “For instance, Veugelers (2012) and Borghesi, Cainelli, and Mazzanti (2015) investigate EIs in EU firms and their policy- related drivers, focusing attention on policy motivations and specific actions such as the European Emission Trading System (EU ETS).”
- Financial barriers and environmental innovations: evidence from EU manufacturing firms (2017, background): “As the manufacturing sector is “heavy” for the environment, but with a huge innovative (and also eco-innovative) potential (Borghesi et al. 2015), it is extremely important to investigate the role of financial barriers to EI on this sector.”
- Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany (2018, methodology): “Using the CIS survey as a key data source has made it possible to better understand the determinants of ecoinnovation in general, and the role of policy in particular (Borghesi et al., 2015; Horbach et al., 2013; Rennings and Rammer, 2011).”