Women's Role in Economic Development
By L. Corner. 2008
739 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6dfb0e65b3daba8d421be8defefe12ce428221e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Indra de Soysa
- Janneke Pieters
- D. Augustine
- Eric Neumayer
- A. Gündüz-Hoşgör
- Jeroen Smits
- Stephan Klasen
- Yoo-Mi Chin
In Gender Studies
- John C. Anyanwu
- Stephan Klasen
- Janneke Pieters
- Indra de Soysa
- A. Gündüz-Hoşgör
- Jeroen Smits
- Yoo-Mi Chin
- Eric Neumayer
In Sociology and Political Science
- Indra de Soysa
- Stephan Klasen
- Eric Neumayer
- A. Gündüz-Hoşgör
- Jeroen Smits
- Janneke Pieters
- Yoo-Mi Chin
- John C. Anyanwu
Citations in the corpus
- Male backlash, bargaining, or exposure reduction?: women’s working status and physical spousal violence in India (2007, background): “…region where plough cultivation is predominant, demand for female labor is low, whereas in the rice-growing region where weeding and transplanting is prevalent, demand for female labor is high (Boserup 1970).7 On the other hand, we do not observe this distinct dichotomy in the employment of men.”
- Variation in labor market participation of married women in Turkey (2008, background): “As a result of this development, broadly speaking, nowadays three major groups of women can be distinguished with different life styles.”
- Gender Equality in Employment in Africa: Empirical Analysis and Policy Implications (2013, background): “Thus, this finding supports Boserup’s (1970) assertion that the curvilinear relationship between economic development and gender equality is U‐shaped. However, this U‐shaped relationship contradicts the findings of Chen (2004), Tseloni et al.”
- Globalisation, Women's Economic Rights and Forced Labour (2007, background): “Boserup (1970) suggests that the relationship might be non-linear with”
- What Explains the Stagnation of Female Labor Force Participation in Urban India? (2015, methodology): “This is what drives reductions in FLFP according to the so-called Feminization-U hypothesis (Boserup 1970; Goldin 1994; Mammen and Paxson 2000; Gaddis and Klasen 2014).1 Participation is further reduced because of social stigma against women working outside of the home, especially in factory work,…”