A reliable and valid self-rating measure of the restorative quality of natural environments

By Ke-Tsung Han. 2003

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6de28fde77acda71fffae798dcc0569db87c3795

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. A. V. D. Berg
2. T. Hartig
3. R. Berto

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. T. Hartig
2. R. Berto
3. A. V. D. Berg
4. H. Staats
5. Margherita Pasini
6. Catherine Ortner
7. Margherita Brondino
8. Rob Hall

In Social Psychology

1. T. Hartig
2. Catherine Ortner
3. H. Staats
4. A. V. D. Berg
5. R. Berto

Citations in the corpus

• How to Measure the Restorative Quality of Environments: The PRS-11 (2014, background): “Since Hartig et al.’s work (1997a) there have been only two published studies aimed at assessing the psychometric characteristics of the scale (Pasini Berto, Scopelliti, & Carrus, 2009; Han, 2003).”
• Preference for Nature in Urbanized Societies: Stress, Restoration, and the Pursuit of Sustainability (2007, background): “Several groups of researchers have departed from ART in efforts to measure perceived restorative quality in environments (Bagot, 2004; Berto, 2005; Han, 2003; Hartig, Korpela, Evans, & Gärling, 1997; Hartig, Mang, & Evans, 1991, Study 2; Herzog, Maguire, & Nebel, 2003; Korpela & Hartig, 1996; Lauman”
• The Role of Nature in Coping with Psycho-Physiological Stress: A Literature Review on Restorativeness (2014, methodology): “, Restorative Outcome Scale [96], Revised Perceived Restorativeness Scale [97], Perceived Restorative Characteristics Questionnaire [94], PRS-short version [23], but questions about the scale”