Asperity contact theories: Do they predict linearity between contact area and load?

By Giuseppe Carbone, Francesco Bottiglione. 2008

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials, Surfaces, Coatings and Films

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6de02776ef5d419b6cb892e61ed5aa4dbdea2281

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Andreas Almqvist
2. Giuseppe Carbone
3. C. Putignano
4. Jean-François Molinari
5. Yang Xu
6. Martin H. Müser
7. Nicola Maria Pugno
8. R. Jackson

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Yang Xu
2. R. Jackson
3. Giuseppe Carbone
4. C. Putignano
5. Andreas Almqvist
6. Daniele Dini
7. Jean-François Molinari
8. Stanislaw Stupkiewicz

In Surfaces, Coatings and Films

1. R. Jackson
2. Andreas Almqvist
3. C. Putignano
4. Giuseppe Carbone

Citations in the corpus

• Modeling and simulation in tribology across scales: An overview (2018, background): “Numerous comparisons between complete numerical sim ulations, multi-asperity models and Persson's theory can be found in the literature [119-121,12741].”
• Statistical model of nearly complete elastic rough surface contact (2014, background): “This phenomenon is widely accepted and explored in details by Carbone and Bottiglione (2008).”
• A new efficient numerical method for contact mechanics of rough surfaces (2012, unknown): “The relation between the contact area and the applied load is clearly linear, according to some analytical theories (Persson, 2001) and other numerical investigations (Yang et al., 2006; Hyun et al., 2004; Carbone and Bottiglione, 2008; Campana and Muser, 2007).”