Optimizing F-measure: A Tale of Two Approaches

By Nan Ye, Kian Ming Adam Chai, Wee Sun Lee, Hai Leong Chieu. 2012

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

F-measures are popular performance metrics, particularly for tasks with imbalanced data sets. Algorithms for learning to maximize F-measures follow two approaches: the empirical utility maximization (EUM) approach learns a classifier having optimal performance on training data, while the decision-theoretic approach learns a probabilistic model and then predicts labels with maximum expected F-measure. In this paper, we investigate the theoretical justifications and connections for these two approaches, and we study the conditions under which one approach is preferable to the other using synthetic and real datasets. Given accurate models, our results suggest that the two approaches are asymptotically equivalent given large training and test sets. Nevertheless, empirically, the EUM approach appears to be more robust against model misspecification, and given a good model, the decision-theoretic approach appears to be better for handling rare classes and a common domain adaptation scenario.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Zachary Chase Lipton
  2. Peter A. Flach
  3. Meelis Kull
  4. Harish Guruprasad Ramaswamy
  5. Balakrishnan Narayanaswamy
  6. Ryan M. Rifkin
  7. Alan Mackey
  8. Ariel Gordon

Citations in the corpus