Static and dynamic analyses of tensegrity structures. Part II. Quasi-static analysis

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Advanced form-finding for cable-strut structures (2010, methodology): “It confirms that the structures are mechanically stable (Murakami, 2001; Ohsaki and Zhang, 2006).”
Initial self-stress design of tensegrity grid structures (2010, unknown): “Using this criterion, stability of any pre-stressed or tensegrity grid structure can be controlled by checking eigenvalues of tangent stiffness matrix of the structure [26,25].”
Zero stiffness tensegrity structures (2007, background): “The column vectors d and f are related by the tangent stiffness matrix Kt, Ktd ¼ f ð5Þ The tangent stiffness matrix is well-known in structural analysis, and many different formulations for it exist (e.g., Murakami, 2001; Masic et al., 2005).”
Tensegrity frameworks: Static analysis review. (2008, methodology): “Using the approach proposed by Calladine [9] and S. Pellegrino [62, 63] based on a modified Gaussian reduction method, or the similar approach of Murakami [54] based on SVD decomposition, it is possible to obtain the dimension and a basis for both resolvable and non-resolvable external forces, as we”
Tensegrity frameworks: Dynamic analysis review and open problems (2009, methodology): “Murakami [55, 56 ], Murakami and Nishimura [57, 58] also used Lagrangian formulation to model the dynamic behavior of a tensegrity structure taking into account additional non-linear effects, such as the deformability of the structure edges and the non-linear elasticity of the tensional members.”