Accounting, Organizing, and Economizing: Connecting Accounting Research and Organization Theory
By P. Miller, Michael Power. 2013
470 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6dd248dda4e4809963ed1af06aeaecb701a1a18b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Jan Mouritsen
- Jeffrey Unerman
- Brendan O’Dwyer
- Kristian Kreiner
- I. Steccolini
- Ed Vosselman
- A. Haji
- J. Emil Morhardt
In Management Information Systems
- I. Steccolini
- Jeffrey Unerman
- Brendan O’Dwyer
- Kristian Kreiner
- Jan Mouritsen
- Ed Vosselman
- J. Bebbington
Citations in the corpus
- Accounting, decisions and promises (2016, background): “However, accounting also supplies memory in a more dynamic sense, namely that of problematisation and questioning (Busco & Quattrone, 2015; Miller & Power, 2013; Quattrone, 2015) through its attention-directing qualities (Simon, Guetzkow, Kozmetsky, & Tyndall, 1954).”
- Corporate reporting and accounting for externalities (2018, background): “However, reported metrics are often interpreted by users as objective and comparable measures, with little or no questioning of the processes or assumptions underlying each metric (Miller and Power 2013).”
- Accounting and the post-new public management (2018, background): “Finally, a body of research has provided evidence and highlighted the importance of both the organizational and the societal impacts of accounting (Miller and Power, 2013; Vosselman, 2014; Modell, 2014).”
- Who and What Really Counts? Stakeholder Prioritization and Accounting for Social Value (2015, unknown): “…of organizational and social management (Burchell et al., 1980; Chapman et al., 2009), and can enable particular management ideas or approaches to be operationalized and made real by giving form and substance to the objects and activities at the heart of management (Miller and Power, 2013).”
- The ‘performativity thesis’ and its critics: Towards a relational ontology of management accounting (2014, background): “Next, a comparison between these studies could then particularly focus on the different ways through which accounting territorialises, mediates, adjudicates and subjectivises (Miller and Power 2013) in these different settings.”