The Design of Innovation: Lessons from and for Competent Genetic Algorithms
By David E. Goldberg. 2002
1,082 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- David Hadka
- Patrick M. Reed
- Holger R. Maier
- Kalyanmoy Deb
- Jasper A. Vrugt
- Joshua B. Kollat
- Joseph R. Kasprzyk
- Yaochu Jin
Citations in the corpus
- Automating Biomedical Data Science Through Tree-Based Pipeline Optimization (2016, background): “We believe that guided search did not outperform random search in this case because TPOT currently lacks clear building blocks [18]—i.e., small combinations of pipeline operators that can be combined to improve accuracy—for evolution to act on, and instead builds pipelines from powerful pipeline…”
- TimeAware test suite prioritization (2006, methodology): “0max Ø F indM axF itnessT uple(Rg-1, F ) 26. return 0max Figure 2: The GA Prioritization Algorithm. ation Rg+1 of test tuples.”
- Innovization: innovating design principles through optimization (2006, background): “Goldberg [8] narrates that a competent genetic algorithm – a search and optimization procedure based on natural evolution and natural genetics – can be an effective mean to arrive at an innovative design for a single objective scenario.”
- Evolutionary algorithms and other metaheuristics in water resources: Current status, research challenges and future directions (2014, background): “However, formally distinguishing the statistical behaviour of EAs on a given topology is an uncertain process itself that requires rigorous statistical experiments (see Section 2.3 and Back et al., 1997; Bayer and Finkel, 2004; Goh and Tan, 2009; Goldberg, 2002; Hadka and Reed, 2012; Matott et al., ”
- On the practical genetic algorithms (2005, background): “On the basis of innovation intuition, in special, a design-decomposition theory has been proposed for developing competent (selec-torecombinative) GAs, which are a class of GAs that solve hard problems quickly, accurately, and reliably [4].”
- On the Evolutionary Optimization of Many Conflicting Objectives (2007, background): “High-performing configurations are indicated by a solid boundary around the square, such that regions of good performance (or sweet-spots [35]) can be highlighted.”
- Review of Deep Learning Algorithms and Architectures (2019, background): “Reference [55] postulates that correctly performed exchanges (e.”
- Design of microvascular flow networks using multi-objective genetic algorithms (2008, methodology): “The last twenty years have seen substantial progress in the understanding of the mechanics behind the optimization based on Genetic Algorithms (GAs) [ 15 ], the most popular of these evolutionary methods.”
- Comparing state-of-the-art evolutionary multi-objective algorithms for long-term groundwater monitoring design (2005, background): “Theoretically, this approach allows the MOEA s population size to increase or decrease, and in the limit when the e-dominance archive size stabilizes, the e-NSGAII s ‘‘connected runs’’ are equivalent to a diversity-based EA search enhancement recommended by Goldberg [50] termed ‘‘time continuation’’”
- Genetic and Evolutionary Computation – GECCO 2004 (2004, methodology): “Research addressing the shortcomings of PSO is ongoing and includes such changes as dynamic or exotic sociometries [6,9,10,11,12], spatially extended particles that bounce [13], increased particle diversity [4,5], evolutionary selection mechanisms [14], and of course tunable parameters in the veloci”
- An introduction and survey of estimation of distribution algorithms (2011, methodology): “Efficiency enhancement techniques based on this principle are called evaluation relaxation techniques (Goldberg, 2002; Smith, Dike, & Stegmann, 1995; Sastry, Goldberg, & Pelikan, 2001a; Pelikan & Sastry, 2004; Sastry, Pelikan, & Goldberg, 2004).”
- A tutorial for competent memetic algorithms: model, taxonomy, and design issues (2005, background): “Having provided a fairly broad-brush definition of the class of meta-heuristics that we are concerned with, it is still vital to note that the design of “competent” [33] Memetic Algorithms”
- Non-linear least squares ellipse fitting using the genetic algorithm with applications to strain analysis (2008, unknown): “Genetic algorithms are global optimization techniques that use the mechanics of natural selection or biological evolution to converge to a solution (Goldberg, 1989, 2002).”
- Evolutionary multiobjective optimization in water resources: The past, present, and future (2012, methodology): “Our use of attainment thresholds in this context is the first study to statistically characterize the “controllability” of algorithms, or the likelihood that a random parameterization of an algorithm will perform well on an application problem [Goldberg 2002].”