A high‐quality global gravity field model from CHAMP GPS tracking data and accelerometry (EIGEN‐1S)
By C. Reigber, G. Balmino, P. Schwintzer, Richard Biancale, A. Bode, J. Lemoine, Rolf König, S. Loyer, H. Neumayer, J. Marty and 3 more. 2002
233 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6dc0fe84a3c49711fb8e5ecb8945900209a69265
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Sean Bruinsma
- Jeff Forbes
- Adrian Jäggi
- R. S. Nerem
- Gerhard Beutler
- C. Reigber
- Urs Hugentobler
- Rolf König
In Molecular Biology
In Oceanography
- Sean Bruinsma
- Jeff Forbes
- Adrian Jäggi
- Eelco Doornbos
- Olivier Francis
- Urs Hugentobler
- Olivier de Viron
- Arnaud Watlet
Citations in the corpus
- An Earth gravity field model complete to degree and order 150 from GRACE: EIGEN-GRACE02S (2005, background): “These characteristics led to a break-through in the determination of the long-wavelength gravitational field (Reigber et al., 2002) already from a limited amount of mission data.”
- Pseudo-Stochastic Orbit Modeling Techniques for Low-Earth Orbiters (2006, methodology): “1999), and the GPS tracking data proved the feasibility to separate gravitational from non-gravitational perturbations for gravity field estimation (Reigber et al. 2002).”
- Density and Winds in the Thermosphere Deduced from Accelerometer Data (2007, methodology): “Accelerations in the radial direction are not used in these studies, because they are less sensitive by a factor of 10 and have had repeated troubles since launch [12].”
- The GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam/Groupe de Recherche de Gèodésie Spatiale satellite-only and combined gravity field models: EIGEN-GL04S1 and EIGEN-GL04C (2008, methodology): “For the coefficients up to approximately degree and order 150, the calibration was based on internal subset solutions and on comparisons with external independent gravity field solutions (Reigber et al. 2002; Schmidt et al. 2007), such as GGM02C.”
- First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches (2011, methodology): “In addition, the SST equations, together with the vector of non-gravitational accelerations, can be used in very much the same way as for the CHAMP mission (e.g., Reigber et al. 2002, Mayer-Gürr et al. 2005, Jäggi et al. 2011).”
- Atmospheric densities derived from CHAMP/STAR accelerometer observations (2004, methodology): “This study bene7ts signi7cantly from the EIGEN-1S gravity 7eld model, the use of which improves the POD and the ongoing determination of the STAR calibration parameters.”
- Geophysics From Terrestrial Time‐Variable Gravity Measurements (2017, background): “For completeness let us mention other satellites such as the Laser Geodynamic Satellite (LAGEOS) (Seeber, 2003), the Challenging Minisatellite Payload (CHAMP) (Reigber et al., 2002), and the Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) (Pail et al., 2011).”