Low-Rank Approximation and Regression in Input Sparsity Time
By Kenneth L. Clarkson, David P. Woodruff. arXiv.org, 2012
732 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Mechanics, Numerical Analysis
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6dad15d39b2b5f19d038171281a1dc8a7e1f052f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- David P. Woodruff
- Michael W. Mahoney
- Peilin Zhong
- Zhao Song
- Shusen Wang
- Petros Drineas
- Nicolas Loizou
- Huy L. Nguyen
In Computational Mechanics
- David P. Woodruff
- Michael W. Mahoney
- Zhao Song
- Peilin Zhong
- Petros Drineas
- Shusen Wang
- Huy L. Nguyen
- M. J. van der Laan
In Numerical Analysis
- Shusen Wang
- Zhao Song
- Huy L. Nguyen
- Cameron Musco
- Christopher Musco
- Peilin Zhong
- Michael B. Cohen
- Michael W. Mahoney
Citations in the corpus
- Dimensionality Reduction for k-Means Clustering and Low Rank Approximation (2014, methodology): “They relax the guarantee of subspace embeddings, which have received significant attention recently [43, 15].”
- Handbook of Big Data (2016, methodology): “The software will be available as an R-package, but the instructions below do not reflect this and get the reader going by sourcing the software from the first author’s site.”
- Weighted low rank approximations with provable guarantees (2016, methodology): “This also generalizes affine embeddings in [16] in which t = 1 and B1 may have multiple columns; we stress that the design matrices A may be different.”
- Optimal principal component analysis in distributed and streaming models (2015, methodology): “One could hope to do for communication what recent work on input sparsity algorithms [18, 35, 36, 12, 21] has done for computation, i.e., obtain protocols sensitive to the number of non-zero entries of A .”
- Improved Distributed Principal Component Analysis (2014, methodology): “(Clarkson and Woodruff, 2013; Meng and Mahoney, 2013; Nelson and Nguyên, 2012) Suppose n > d and ` = O(d 2 2 ).”
- Sketching as a Tool for Numerical Linear Algebra (2014, background): “Suppose r = Θ(d/ε2) and S is a r × n matrix of i.i.d. normal random variables with mean zero and variance 1/r, denoted N(0, 1/r).”
- A statistical perspective on algorithmic leveraging (2013, unknown): “, least-squares approximation [11, 12], least absolute deviations regression [6, 29], and low-rank matrix approximation [28, 7].”
- Simple and deterministic matrix sketching (2012, background): “A recent result along these lines [8], gives simple and efficient subspace embeddings that can be applied in time O(nnz(A)) for any matrix A.”
- Randomized Extended Kaczmarz for Solving Least Squares (2012, methodology): “…generic two step procedure: first randomly (and efficiently) project the linear system into sufficiently many dimensions, and second return the solution of the down-sampled linear system as an approximation to the original optimal solution [DMM06, Sar06, CW09, NDT09, MZ11, DMMS11], see also [CW12].”
- Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal, and massively scalable single-cell analysis (2022, unknown): “Here, we perform sketching using a leverage score sampling-based strategy that has been proposed for large-scale information retrieval problems 56 and can be rapidly and efficiently computed on sparse datasets.”
- Subspace Embeddings for the Polynomial Kernel (2014, methodology): “Sketching has emerged as a powerful dimensionality reduction technique for accelerating statistical learning techniques such as `p-regression, low rank approximation, and principal component analysis (PCA) [12, 5, 14].”
- OSNAP: Faster Numerical Linear Algebra Algorithms via Sparser Subspace Embeddings (2012, methodology): “We furthermore point out that another reduction from (1 + ε)-approximate least squares regression to OSE’s via preconditioning followed by gradient descent actually only needs an OSE with constant distortion independent of ε (see [11]), so that ε = Θ(1) in an OSE is of primary interest.”
- Randomized Block Krylov Methods for Stronger and Faster Approximate Singular Value Decomposition (2015, methodology): “1 Prior Work The fastest randomized SVD algorithms [3, 5] run in O(nnz(A)) time1, are based on non-iterative sketching methods, and return a rank k matrix Z with orthonormal columns z1, .”
- Low rank approximation with entrywise l1-norm error (2017, methodology): “To improve the approximation factor, after computing SA, we `1-project each of the rows of A onto SA using linear programming or fast algorithms for `1-regression [24, 68], obtaining an n × d matrix B of rank O (k logk ).”
- Solving linear programs in the current matrix multiplication time (2018, result): “Similar to (2), Lemma 4.2 shows that The previously fastest algorithm involves maintaining the matrix inverse ( A A (cid:62) ) − 1 using sub-space embedding techniques [Sar06, CW13, NN13] and leverage score sampling [SS11].”