'Have you thought about…': talking about ethical implications of research

By BruckmanAmy. 2020

11 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society, Philosophy

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

1. Shannon L. Spruit
2. Verena Rieser
3. Gavin Abercrombie
4. Dirk Hovy
5. A. S. Bergman
6. Emily Dinan
7. Y-Lan Boureau

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Verena Rieser
2. Gavin Abercrombie
3. Dirk Hovy
4. A. S. Bergman
5. Emily Dinan
6. Shannon L. Spruit
7. Y-Lan Boureau

In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

1. Shannon L. Spruit
2. Gavin Abercrombie
3. Verena Rieser
4. Emily Dinan
5. Y-Lan Boureau
6. Zeerak Talat
7. Svetlana Kiritchenko
8. Michael Wiegand

In Philosophy

1. Verena Rieser
2. Y-Lan Boureau

Citations in the corpus

• Anticipating Safety Issues in E2E Conversational AI: Framework and Tooling (2021, background): “Wider Viewpoints: Input from community or domain experts relevant to the model application is highly recommended throughout the model development process, but particularly so in release deliberation to increase understanding of the risk landscape and mitigation strategies (Ovadya & Whittlestone, 201”
• Guiding the Release of Safer E2E Conversational AI through Value Sensitive Design (2022, background): “…throughout this framework – from envisioning potential harms, to feedback for the purpose of model improvement – but particularly so in release deliberation to better understand the risk landscape and mitigation strategies (Martin Jr et al., 2020; Ovadya and Whittlestone, 2019; Bruckman, 2020).”