Estimating tree and stand variables in a Corsican Pine woodland from terrestrial laser scanner data

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Non Destructive Method for Biomass Prediction Combining TLS Derived Tree Volume and Wood Density (2015, methodology): “NLS methods need accurate starting parameters, while nowadays being reported to be more accurate than Hough transforms [12].”
Automatic Stem Mapping Using Single-Scan Terrestrial Laser Scanning (2012, methodology): “Tree trunks are identified by means of point clustering or circle finding [19], [23]–[25] or by waveform analysis using the Echidna1 validation instrument [26].”
International benchmarking of terrestrial laser scanning approaches for forest inventories (2018, background): “The past two decades have witnessed steady progress in these types of studies (Henning and Radtke, 2006; Hosoi and Omasa, 2006; Lefsky and McHale, 2008; Maas et al., 2008; Strahler et al., 2008; Côté et al., 2009; Jupp et al., 2009; Tansey et al., 2009).”
Nondestructive estimates of above‐ground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning (2015, methodology): “1 27 and 1 33 m above the lowest point (Tansey et al. 2009).”