Working with emotion: Issues for the researcher in fieldwork and teamwork
By G. Hubbard, K. Backett-Milburn, D. Kemmer. 2001
360 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6d9336948c5f65a0e7f2521f0d156c8f159ece52
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Stina Bergman Blix
- Å. Wettergren
- M. Holmes
- Virginia Dickson-Swift
- A. Irvine
- Pranee Liamputtong
- S. Kippen
- E. James
Citations in the corpus
- I'm Okay, You're Okay?: Reflections on the Well-Being and Ethical Requirements of Researchers and Research Participants in Conducting Qualitative Fieldwork Interviews (2008, background): “Indeed, there is a growing number of personal accounts of how researchers have experienced and responded to the emotional impact of their fieldwork encounters (see Corden et al., 2005; Hubbard et al., 2001, for an overview).”
- The emotional labour of gaining and maintaining access to the field (2015, background): “An exception here is Blackman (2007) who discusses how analysis of emotions can uncover the ‘hidden ethnography’, and Hubbard et al. (2001) who argue that such an analysis will enhance the ‘integrity of the data.’”
- Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work (2009, background): “It has been previously reported that much of the discussion about emotions in research and how the researcher actually ‘feels’ in the process is often done informally at the photocopier, coffee machine or in the corridors (Hubbard et al., 2001).”
- Ethical Issues in the Use of In-Depth Interviews: Literature Review and Discussion (2009, background): “Harm Many papers suggest ways to avoid harm, both to participants and to the researcher [31, 43, 45, 47, 51, 59, 64, 68, 69, 85].”
- Researching Emotional Reflexivity (2015, background): “…with the emotions of interview participants it is usually as something that the researcher wants to avoid evoking, that are risky for participants, or must be managed by researchers in order to get the information they want (Corbin & Morse, 2003; Frisoli, 2010; Hubbard et al., 2010; Thuesen, 2011).”