Experimental evidence does not support the Habitat Amount Hypothesis

By N. Haddad, Andrew Gonzalez, L. Brudvig, M. Burt, D. Levey, Ellen I. Damschen. 2017

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6d918a401f5bce281d6bc0fcfa8fb5d24ef6aabf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Michel Loreau
2. Owen L. Petchey
3. Barbara C. Schmid
4. T. Erős
5. B. Cardinale
6. J. J. Govoni
7. David Tilman
8. J. Bruno

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Michel Loreau
2. T. Fukami

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. S. Cunningham
2. Annie Ouin
3. Michel Loreau
4. Owen L. Petchey
5. Barbara C. Schmid
6. David Tilman
7. J. Emmett Duffy
8. B. Cardinale

Citations in the corpus

• Relationships among ecological traits of wild bee communities along gradients of habitat amount and fragmentation (2017, background): “We explored the joint effects of habitat amount and fragmentation on bee communities as these two landscape changes are often correlated in real-world landscapes and have contrasting effects on biodiversity (Fahrig 2003, Haddad et al. 2017).”