Invariances and Diversities in the Patterns of Industrial Evolution: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Industries

By Giulio Bottazzi, Elena Cefis, Giovanni Dosi, A. Secchi. 2007

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6d8c8c39658581028c1b1e557cd2ae5c5159ef03

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

A Closer Look at Serial Growth Rate Correlation (2006, result): “However, much weaker autocorrelation was later reported in comparable studies by Kumar (1985) and Dunne and Hughes (1994). More recently, availability of better datasets has encouraged the consideration of annual autocorrelation patterns.”
Jobs for Shared Prosperity: Time for Action in the Middle East and North Africa (2013, background): “That is, a handful of fi rms experience high employment growth while most other fi rms hardly grow at all (see Bottazzi et al. 2007).”
Firm Size Distribution under Horizontal and Vertical R&D (2010, background): “As their own explanation, Cabral and Mata (2003) consider the small- rms selection argument based on a theoretical model where nancing constraints are especially relevant for small young rms.”
On the Autocorrelation of Growth Rates (2009, unknown): “2009), Italian data (Bottazzi et al. 2007) and Community Innovation Survey (CIS) data (Hölzl and Friesenbichler 2008), although it appears that, in our sample, the fat-tailed nature of the growth rate distribution is even more extreme.”
A new class of asymmetric exponential power densities with applications to economics and finance (2011, background): “At the micro-economic level, strong leptokurtosis has been identified in business companies growth rates in many developed countries, irrespectively of the proxy used to measure firm size and of the level of disaggregation considered (Stanley et al., 1996; Bottazzi and Secchi, 2003, 2006a,b; Bottazz”
Corporate growth and industrial dynamics: evidence from French manufacturing (2005, methodology): “among many others Hart and Prais (1956); Ijiri and Simon (1977), and Bottazzi et al. (2003)) that the distribution of firm sizes is right-skewed as indicated by the positive values for the skewness.”
Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics as Evolutionary Processes (2009, background): “…persistent inter-firm and inter-plant asymmetries in production coefficients at all levels of disaggregation (cf. Nelson, 1981, Baily et al., 1992, Baldwin, 1995, Bartelsman and Doms, 2000, Bottazzi et al, 2007; Jensen and McGuckin, 1997, Power, 1998, Rumelt, 1991, Syverson, 2004; and Dosi, 2007).”
Firm Growth : a Survey (2007, background): “On the other hand, negative serial correlation has also been reported – some examples are Boeri and Cramer (1992) for German firms, Goddard et al. (2002) for quoted Japanese firms, Bottazzi et al. (2007) for Italian manufacturing, and Bottazzi et al. (2005) for French manufacturing.”