When, Why, and Which Pretrained GANs Are Useful?

By T. Grigoryev, Andrey Voynov, Artem Babenko. 2022

25 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The literature has proposed several methods to finetune pretrained GANs on new datasets, which typically results in higher performance compared to training from scratch, especially in the limited-data regime. However, despite the apparent empirical benefits of GAN pretraining, its inner mechanisms were not analyzed in-depth, and understanding of its role is not entirely clear. Moreover, the essential practical details, e.g., selecting a proper pretrained GAN checkpoint, currently do not have rigorous grounding and are typically determined by trial and error. This work aims to dissect the process of GAN finetuning. First, we show that initializing the GAN training process by a pretrained checkpoint primarily affects the model's coverage rather than the fidelity of individual samples. Second, we explicitly describe how pretrained generators and discriminators contribute to the finetuning process and explain the previous evidence on the importance of pretraining both of them. Finally, as an immediate practical benefit of our analysis, we describe a simple recipe to choose an appropriate GAN checkpoint that is the most suitable for finetuning to a particular target task. Importantly, for most of the target tasks, Imagenet-pretrained GAN, despite having poor visual quality, appears to be an excellent starting point for finetuning, resembling the typical pretraining scenario of discriminative computer vision models.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Generative Models, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Andreas Blattmann
  2. Axel Sauer
  3. Katja Schwarz
  4. Robin Rombach
  5. Dominik Lorenz
  6. Andreas Geiger
  7. Björn Ommer
  8. Simon Lacoste-Julien

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Axel Sauer
  3. Robin Rombach
  4. Andreas Blattmann
  5. Andreas Geiger
  6. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  7. Chen Change Loy
  8. Dacheng Tao

In Generative Models

  1. Andreas Blattmann
  2. Axel Sauer
  3. Robin Rombach
  4. Dominik Lorenz
  5. Katja Schwarz
  6. Andreas Geiger
  7. Richard Zhang
  8. Eli Shechtman

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Axel Sauer
  2. Andreas Blattmann
  3. Robin Rombach
  4. Dominik Lorenz
  5. Katja Schwarz
  6. Andreas Geiger
  7. Raquel Urtasun
  8. Sanja Fidler

Citations in the corpus