Deconcentration by Demolition: Public Housing, Poverty, and Urban Policy

By J. Crump. 2002

266 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Design That Enables Diversity: The Complications of a Planning Ideal (2006, background): “…such as “concentration” or “deconcentration” of poverty is seen as superficial in that it disguises the underlying political and economic processes of poverty and provides “justification for simplistic spatial solutions to complex social, economic, and political problems” (Crump 2002, 581).”
Neoliberal Urban Policy and New Paths of Neighborhood Change in the American Inner City (2004, background): “unit (one-for-one replacement) removes some of the last federal protection for very-lowincome residents, further allowing local governments the freedom to pursue their own development agendas (Crump, 2002; Hackworth and Smith, 2001; Wyly and Hammel, 1999).”
The financialisation of rental housing: A comparative analysis of New York City and Berlin (2016, background): “…governments to transfer public loans to private loans; demolish or privatize public or social housing; reduce supply-side subsidies in favor of housing allowances; promote home ownership; and deregulate rents (cf. Aalbers and Holm, 2008; Crump, 2002; Turner and Whitehead, 2002; Wyly et al., 2010).”