Comparative study of different methodologies for quantitative rock analysis by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy in a simulated Martian atmosphere

By B. Sallé, J. Lacour, P. Mauchien, P. Fichet, Sylvestre Maurice, G. Manhès. 2006

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Analytical Chemistry, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6d44aaa58ce1c5a3d6ad6897be137f270cb36f82

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Analytical Chemistry

1. G. Cristoforetti
2. Stefano Legnaioli
3. Vincenzo Palleschi
4. E. Tognoni

In Mechanics of Materials

1. G. Cristoforetti
2. Stefano Legnaioli
3. Vincenzo Palleschi
4. E. Tognoni

Citations in the corpus

• Calibration-Free Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy: State of the art (2010, methodology): “[33] tested CF-LIBS quantitative analysis on spectra that were acquired in a stand-off configuration at intermediate distance (3 m).”
• Calibration free laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy of oxide materials (2010, unknown): “A similar observation was reported earlier [14].”
• A numerical study of expected accuracy and precision in Calibration-Free Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy in the assumption of ideal analytical plasma ☆ (2007, methodology): “Researchers from other groups have also applied the CF-LIBS approach to the analysis of metallic alloys, dielectric materials and rocks [7–15].”