Saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) using Populus in boreal aspen stands of western Canada: spatiotemporal variation and conservation of assemblages

By H. E. J. Hammond, D. Langor, J. Spence. 2004

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6d2eda62d474b4e0f590c85513fabc186606ab81

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Deadwood enrichment in European forests – Which tree species should be used to promote saproxylic beetle diversity? (2016, unknown): “In other regions, such as Finland (Kouki et al., 2004), the UK (Rotheray et al., 2008) and Canada (Hammond et al., 2004) Populus is considered an important tree species for saproxylic insects, which emphasizes that the most effective tree species for saproxylic diversity conservation might differ…”
Does species‐level resolution matter? Taxonomic sufficiency in terrestrial arthropod biodiversity studies (2013, methodology): “C2 Hammond et al. (2004) Two stand ages (mature and old) by three decay classes (1, 2, and 3) 124 92 31”
Diameter of downed woody debris does matter for saproxylic beetle assemblages in temperate oak and pine forests (2011, background): “…Bordeaux 1, UMR1202 BIOGECO, 33612 Cestas, France Large pieces of woody debris have been identified as critical habitats for rare or red-listed beetle species (Jonsell et al. 1998; Hammond et al. 2004; Langor et al. 2008) or fungi (Bader et al. 1995; Sippola and Renvall 1999; Hottola et al. 2009).”
Insect community composition and trophic guild structure in decaying logs from eastern Canadian pine-dominated forests (2006, background): “In addition, few studies (e.g., Hammond et al., 2004) have examined changes in trophic guild structure as logs progress through different stages of decomposition.”
Variable response of different functional groups of saproxylic beetles to substrate manipulation and forest management: Implications for conservation strategies (2007, unknown): “(Siitonen, 1994; Schroeder et al., 1999; Sverdrup-Thygeson and Ims, 2002; Hammond et al., 2004).”
Spatiotemporal changes of beetle communities across a tree diversity gradient (2009, background): “, 2006) and stand age (Hammond et al., 2004; Grimbacher & Catterall, 2007) or stand productivity, which are negligible in our case.”
Saproxylic beetles as indicator species for dead-wood amount and temperature in European beech forests (2012, unknown): “For example, both large pieces of dead wood (Brin et al., 2011; Hammond et al., 2004; Jonsell et al., 1998) as well as small branches (Schiegg, 2001) have been identified as critical habitats for rare or red-listed beetle species or for saproxylic indicator species.”