Farm-Level Effects of Adopting Herbicide-Tolerant Soybeans in the U.S.A.

By J. Fernandez-Cornejo, C. Klotz-Ingram, S. Jans. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 2002

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Farm Profits and Adoption of Precision Agriculture (2016, methodology): “Larger farms are most likely to adopt PA technologies (table 1; Fernandez-Cornejo et al., 2002).”
The Economics of Genetically Modified Crops (2009, background): “Several early studies for HT soybeans in the United States showed that the fee was of a similar magnitude or sometimes higher than the average cost reduction, so that gross margin effects were small or partly negative (e.g., Duffy 2001, Fernandez-Cornejo et al. 2002).”
Testing for Complementarity: Glyphosate Tolerant Soybeans and Conservation Tillage (2015, unknown): “Fernandez-Cornejo, Klotz-Ingram, and Jans (2002) estimated a binomial probit model for GT soybeans using 1,444 survey respondents.”
Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States (2014, unknown): “However, Fernandez-Cornejo et al. (2002) and McBride and El-Osta (2002) found no significant difference between the net returns of adopters and nonadopters of HT soybeans.”
Agricultural Productivity and Structural Transformation. Evidence (2016, background): “Second, GE soybeans are resistant to a specific herbicide (glyphosate), which needs fewer applications: fields cultivated with GE soybeans require an average of 1.55 sprayer trips against 2.45 of conventional soybeans (Duffy and Smith 2001; Fernandez-Cornejo, Klotz-Ingram, and Jans 2002).”