Fiscal Policy Multipliers on Subnational Government Spending

By Jeffrey P. Clemens, Stephen I. Miran. 2012

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6d1744131f3ce69c7a6ccc17cdb3943fb51702a8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Fiscal Stimulus in a Monetary Union: Evidence from U.S. Regions (2014, unknown): “The theoretical framework we describe helps to interpret recent and ongoing research on the effects of other forms of local government spending (Acconcia et al., 2011; Chodorow-Reich et al., 2012; Clemens and Miran, 2012; Cohen et al., 2011; Fishback and Kachanovskaya, 2010; Serrato and Wingender, 2”
Government Spending Multipliers in Developing Countries : Evidence from Lending by Official Creditors (2012, unknown): “Clemens and Miran ( 2012 ) and Shoag ( 2010 ) study fluctuations in state-level spending driven by variations in the stringency of balanced-budget rules, and pension fund windfalls, respectively.”
Macroeconomic Shocks and Their Propagation (2016, background): “y A notable exception is the paper by Clemens and Miran (2012), which identifies exogenous variation in state-level spending.”
The Economic Effects of Public Financing: Evidence from Municipal Bond Ratings Recalibration (2017, unknown): “24 Clemens and Miran (2012) use state government spending cuts attributable to institutional rules on budget deficits to estimate a spending multiplier.”
Second-Generation Fiscal Rules; Balancing Simplicity, Flexibility, and Enforceability (2018, background): “…amendment), studies converged to show that more binding rules have a stronger disciplinary effect (von Hagen 1991; Poterba 1994; Bohn and Inman 1996; Clemens and Miran 2012; Lutz and Follette 2012).10 Evidence for European countries also suggests that stronger rules are associated with lower…”
Tax Cuts for Whom? Heterogeneous Effects of Income Tax Changes on Growth and Employment (2019, unknown): “Many studies provide evidence that lowerincome households tend to have higher marginal propensities to consume (McCarthy, 1995; Parker, 1999; Dynan et al., 2004; Johnson et al., 2006; Jappelli and Pistaferri, 2010; Parker et al., 2013).(3) A second strand of evidence relates to tax policy and labor ”