Hierarchical Spatial Capture–Recapture Models for Estimating Density from Trapping Arrays

63 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparison of density estimation methods for mammal populations with camera traps in the Kaa‐Iya del Gran Chaco landscape (2012, methodology): “With the introduction of SCR models, inferences can also be made about the underlying point process governing the locations of individuals (Efford, 2004; Borchers & Efford, 2008; Royle & Young, 2008; Royle & Gardner, 2011).”
High jaguar densities and large population sizes in the core habitat of the southwestern Amazon (2013, methodology): “We analyzed the data using various SECR models (Borchers and Efford, 2008; Efford et al., 2009; Royle and Gardner, 2011; Sollmann et al., 2011).”
Improving density estimates for elusive carnivores: Accounting for sex-specific detection and movements using spatial capture–recapture models for jaguars in central Brazil (2011, methodology): “the complete model in its log-linear form (Royle and Gardner, 2011) is as follows:”
Separating mortality and emigration: modelling space use, dispersal and survival with robust‐design spatial capture–recapture data (2014, result): “…dead), and the probability of being captured in a given trap r is pijk½rþ 1 ¼ ð1 pijk½1 Þ hijkr hijk eqn 3 Although this result is identical to the one derived by Royle & Gardner (2011), the competing risk formulation has the advantage that it can easily be generalized to situations where the trap…”