Residents' perceptions on impacts of the FIFA 2002 World Cup: the case of Seoul as a host city.

By Samuel S. Kim, J. Petrick. 2005

443 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6cc6fdc63d5a2b6602db31753ec924d2e913447e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Destination Image: A Meta-Analysis of 2000–2007 Research (2010, unknown): “…Go, 2005; Henderson, 2006), India (Bandyopadhyay & Morais, 2005; Chaudhary, 2000), South Korea (J. S. Chen, 2001; S. S. Kim & Morrison, 2005; S. S. Kim & Petrick, 2005), Indonesia (Litvin & Ling, 2001), Lebanon (Kanso, 2005); Macao (Choi et al., 2007), Russia (Stepchenkova & Morrison, 2006),…”
Impact of Trust on Local Residents’ Mega-Event Perceptions and Their Support (2017, background): “However, Kim and Petrick (2005) argue that all residents are not likely to fully support mega-events.”
Quality of Life, Event Impacts, and Mega-Event Support among South African Residents before and after the 2010 FIFA World Cup (2013, methodology): “As researchers have started to examine event-related impacts over time, several studies have shown that psychological benefits are frequently higher after the event, and may be rated as the most important benefit (Kaplanidou 2012; Kim and Petrick 2005; Kim, Gursoy, and Lee 2006).”
World Cup 2010: South African Economic Perspectives and Perspectives Policy Challenges Informed by the Experience of Germany 2006 (2007, unknown): “Kim and Patrick (2005) analyse Seoul residents ́ perceptions on impacts of the 2002 World Cup. Using a factor analysis, they found that residents positively perceived the impacts on the factors “tourism resource development and urban revitalisation”, “image enhancement and consolidation”, “economic ”
The Social Impact of the Tour de France: Comparisons of Residents' Pre- and Post-event Perceptions (2011, methodology): “Kim and Petrick (2005) investigated residents’ perceptions and opinions of impacts of the FIFA 2002 World Cup in Seoul.”
Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools (2018, background): “…emphasis on the economic benefits derived from tax revenues, employment, investments and infrastructure development (e.g. Bohlmann and van Heerden, 2008; Kim et al., 2006; Lee and Taylor, 2005; Li and Jago, 2013) and investigating residents’ opinions and perceptions (e.g. Kim and Petrick, 2005).”
Residents’ impact perceptions of and attitudes towards tourism development: a meta-analysis (2018, background): “The hosting of a mega-event, such as World Cup or Olympics brings the local community intangible benefits beyond the economic benefits, including international recognition, community pride, and enhanced quality of life (Gursoy, Kim, & Uysal, 2004; Kim & Petrick, 2005).”
Social Policy for Sport Events: Leveraging (Relationships with) Teams from other Nations for Community Benefit (2008, background): “…this insight have included ‘‘exciting city life’’, ‘‘more proud of the city’’ (Andersson, Rustad, & Solberg, 2004, p. 154), ‘‘help foster relationship among residents and visitors’’ (Gursoy, Kim, & Uysal, 2004, p. 175), and ‘‘increased interest in foreign cultures’’ (Kim & Petrick, 2005, p. 31).”
Residents’ support for festivals: integration of emotional solidarity (2017, methodology): “Festival impact items were measured with 19 items, including both positive and negative aspects (Gursoy et al., 2004; Kim & Petrick, 2005; Yolal, Çetinel, & Uysal, 2009).”
Mega-events as a Response to Poverty Reduction: The 2010 FIFA World Cup and its Urban Development Implications (2008, background): “Deccio and Baloglu (2002) offer some treatment of the subject while Kim and Petrick (2005) and Jones’ (2001) commentary is more oblique.”