Systems of innovation and development : evidence from Brazil

By J. Cassiolato, H. Lastres, M. L. Maciel. 2003

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6cc5c4f76f5d374b0d2ca41b1d34e48a115c3cc7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Cluster Absorptive Capacity (2005, background): “…also other public and private institutions and organisations specialised in educating and training human resources R&D, engineering, promotion, financing etc. (Cassiolato et al., 2003: 23) Different approaches seem therefore to have developed their own workable definition of the economic locality.”
Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries (2009, background): “The development of the ‘nanocar’ in India, the Lilliput computer, the take-off of the mobile phone industry in China or the sugar-cane fuels in Brazil are good examples of the role of local users stimulating innovation in these large developing countries.”
INNOVATION POLICIES FOR DEVELOPMENT: TOWARDS A SYSTEMIC EXPERIMENTATION- BASED APPROACH (2009, background): “Our hypothesis is that the role of the domestic users might be more relevant in large markets like Brazil (Cassiolato et al, 2003), India or China (Yung-Chung et al, 2008).”
Global Value Chains Meet Innovation Systems : Are There Learning Opportunities for Developing Countries? (2010, background): “On IS in developing countries see Arocena and Sutz (1999), Cassiolato, Lastres, and Maciel (2003), Edquist (2001); Intarakamnerd, Chairatana, and Tangchitpiboon (2002) and Lundvall, Joseph, Chaminade, and Vang (2009).”
Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries: Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting (2011, background): “The case of the shoe industry in the Sinos Valley in Brazil (Bazan and Navas-Aleman, 2004; Schmitz, 2006) is an exemplifi cation of how inclusion in GVCs can facilitate product and process upgrading but prevent functional upgrading, leaving fi rms dependent on a small number of powerful customers.”
Learning, product innovation, and firm heterogeneity in developing countries; Evidence from Tanzania (2007, background): “…systems’’ is based on the idea that the innovative performance of firms is not only determined by their own efforts, but is strongly influenced by the wider institutional and socio-economic framework in which their activities are embedded (Cassiolato et al., 2003; Edquist, 2004; Fagerberg, 2004).”
The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster (2005, background): “…econ phenomena, such as industrial districts, localised production tems, technology districts, milieux, etc. (for different definitio see among othersBecattini, 1989; Humphrey and Schmitz, 19 Markusen, 1996; Porter, 1998; Capello, 1999; Altenburg and M Stamer, 1999; Cassiolato et al., 2003).”