Investigating object compositionality in Generative Adversarial Networks

By Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Karol Kurach, J. Urgen Schmidhuber, Sylvain Gelly. 2018

49 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Deep generative models seek to recover the process with which the observed data was generated. They may be used to synthesize new samples or to subsequently extract representations. Successful approaches in the domain of images are driven by several core inductive biases. However, a bias to account for the compositional way in which humans structure a visual scene in terms of objects has frequently been overlooked. In this work, we investigate object compositionality as an inductive bias for Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). We present a minimal modification of a standard generator to incorporate this inductive bias and find that it reliably learns to generate images as compositions of objects. Using this general design as a backbone, we then propose two useful extensions to incorporate dependencies among objects and background. We extensively evaluate our approach on several multi-object image datasets and highlight the merits of incorporating structure for representation learning purposes. In particular, we find that our structured GANs are better at generating multi-object images that are more faithful to the reference distribution. More so, we demonstrate how, by leveraging the structure of the learned generative process, one can 'invert' the learned generative model to perform unsupervised instance segmentation. On the challenging CLEVR dataset, it is shown how our approach is able to improve over other recent purely unsupervised object-centric approaches to image generation.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Generative Models

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Mohit Bansal
  2. Trevor Darrell
  3. Yoshua Bengio
  4. Quoc V. Le
  5. Jianfeng Gao
  6. Sergey Levine
  7. Dacheng Tao
  8. Percy Liang

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Trevor Darrell
  3. Dacheng Tao
  4. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  5. Andrea Vedaldi
  6. Xiaogang Wang
  7. Jitendra Malik
  8. Andrew Zisserman

In Generative Models

  1. Andreas Geiger
  2. Jun-Yan Zhu
  3. Richard Zhang
  4. Eli Shechtman
  5. Tero Karras
  6. Stefano Ermon
  7. Timo Aila
  8. Bolei Zhou

Citations in the corpus