Distributional effects of agricultural cooperatives in China: Exclusion of smallholders and potential gains on participation

By J. Ito, Zongshun Bao, Qun Su. 2012

294 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Agricultural Cooperatives and Investment in Organic Soil Amendments and Chemical Fertilizer in China (2018, background): “We draw on the existing literature on cooperative membership to identify explanatory variables (e.g., Bernard and Spielman 2009; Marenya and Barrett 2009; Ito et al. 2012; Abebaw and Haile 2013; Chagwiza et al. 2016; Mojo et al. 2017).”
Impacts of extension access and cooperative membership on technology adoption and household welfare (2017, background): “While it is increasingly clear that informal cooperatives can affect adoption decisions and welfare levels, it is likely to be heavily contingent on the specific technology, the type of resources required for getting access to it, and the socio-economic characteristics of members (Ito et al., 2012; ”
Functions and limitations of farmer cooperatives as innovation intermediaries: Findings from China (2014, background): “, 2010; Wennink and Schrader, 2007; World Bank, 2006), combining innovation intermediation with other kinds of services, like input supply and collective marketing (Carney, 1996; Hussein, 2001; Ito et al., 2012; Wennink and Heemskerk, 2006).”