Social networking in the Columbian ground squirrel, Spermophilus columbianus

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The social network structure of a wild meerkat population: 1. Inter-group interactions (2009, background): “Such interactions may include contact sitting, proximity, social play, displacement, subordination, grooming, contact aggression, or “amicable interactions” (Flack et al. 2006; McCowan et al. 2008; Manno 2008).”
Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis (2015, background): “Alternatively, individuals (nodes in the network) can be removed to determine the impact on social connectivity and network robustness (e.g. Manno 2008; Wey et al. 2008).”
Social networks, long-term associations and age-related sociability of wild giraffes (2013, background): “For example, Manno (2008) and Lusseau et al. (2006) were able to detect social communities within networks of associations in Columbian ground squirrels, Spermophilus columbianus, and bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops sp., respectively, while Sundaresan et al. (2007) and de Silva & Wittemyer (2012)…”
Female bisexual kinship ties maintain social cohesion in a dolphin network (2010, background): “…assort byavarietyof characteristics including sex (reviewed in Ruckstuhl 2007), age (Smith et al. 2002; Silk et al. 2006a; Wolf et al. 2007; Manno 2008), kinship (reviewed in Silk 2002), reproductive status (Sundaresan et al. 2007; Manno 2008; Möller & Harcourt 2008), morphological traits…”