Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice

By Denise F. Polit PhD Faan, Cheryl Tatano Beck DNSc Cnm Faan. 2009

1,035 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c9786f8fc88eb90de5c66d0a696e6b087bb00ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. A. Pietilä
2. Martin Johnson
3. Hanna Kallio
4. Mari Kangasniemi
5. M. DeJonckheere

Citations in the corpus

• Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020, unknown): “ultrasound or other medical imaging) [72, 73].”
• Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. (2016, background): “Although the goal of the qualitative researcher is to gain a rich understanding of the study phenomenon (Polit & Beck 2010), it is ethically dubious to collect data that is not completely necessary for the research (Gibbs et al. 2007).”