Motor imagery.

By Martin Lotze, Ulrike Halsband. Journal of Physiology - Paris, 2006

736 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation (2007, background): “Also Lotze and Halsband (2006) argued that patients with parietal lesions and with left lateral prefrontal lesions are not able to imagine a movement.”
Combining Brain–Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges (2010, background): “MI can be deﬁned as a dynamic state during which the representation of a speciﬁc motor action is internally rehearsed without any overt motor output, and that is governed by the principles of central and peripheral motor control [37, 77, 11, 106].”
Turning Shortcomings into Challenges: Brain-Computer Interfaces for Games (2009, background): “Motor imagery [8] is one of the possible ways in which we can have internally evoked potentials.”
Functional neuroanatomical networks associated with expertise in motor imagery (2008, background): “The association of these complementary techniques has recently been found to be the most reliable procedure to control MI quality, hence guaranteeing the high/low MI abilities of the subjects (Guillot and Collet, 2005b; Lotze and Halsband, 2006).”
Neural oscillations guiding action during effects imagery. (2024, background): “This addresses the problem that it cannot be ensured that the participants are actually imagining actions when they are instructed to do so [39].”