Growth of young Douglas-fir plantations across a gradient in Swiss needle cast severity.

By Douglas A. Maguire, A. Kanaskie, W. Voelker, Randy J. Johnson, G. Johnson. 2002

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Response of branch growth and mortality to silvicultural treatments in coastal Douglas-fir plantations: implications for predicting tree growth. (2007, background): “Healthy stands have a FOLRET of 3–4, while stands with severe SNC have values between 1 and 2 (Maguire et al., 2002).”
Forest Growth and Yield Modeling (2011, background): “…fertilization, and combinations of silvicultural treatments on growth and mortality (Hann et al., 2003), and recently wasmodified to incorporate impacts of plantingwith genetically improved seedlings (Gould et al., 2008) and impacts of the Swiss needle cast (SNC) disease (Maguire et al., 2002).”
Modeling crown structural responses to competing vegetation control, thinning, fertilization, and Swiss needle cast in coastal Douglas-fir of the Pacific Northwest, USA. (2007, background): “(SNC, Table 1), a disease that has become increasingly important in north coastal Oregon by drastically altering both foliage age class structure (Weiskittel et al., 2006a) and stand productivity (Maguire et al., 2002).”
Annualized diameter and height growth equations for Pacific Northwest plantation-grown Douglas-fir, western hemlock, and red alder. (2007, background): “10–30-year-old, Douglas-fir plantations, with varying levels of SNC (Maguire et al., 2002) (http://www.”