ECOLOGICAL RESISTANCE TO BIOLOGICAL INVASION OVERWHELMED BY PROPAGULE PRESSURE
By B. von Holle, Daniel Simberloff. 2005
625 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c82d2e9e6739b96b9e8f0a2fabcac05438ca0e4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Petr Pyšek
- J. Dukes
- D. Richardson
- David U Hooper
- E. Brockerhoff
- Marc W. Cadotte
- Jeannine Cavender-Bares
- Chaeho Byun
In Global and Planetary Change
- David Tilman
- M. van Kleunen
- Marc W. Cadotte
- J. Fridley
- JJ Stachowicz
- W. Dawson
- O. Bossdorf
- Jeannine Cavender-Bares
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Petr Pyšek
- D. Richardson
- David U Hooper
- Marc W. Cadotte
- J. Dukes
- David Tilman
- Jeannine Cavender-Bares
- Chaeho Byun
Citations in the corpus
- Saving camels from straws: how propagule pressure-based prevention policies can reduce the risk of biological invasion (2008, background): “Furthermore, strong evidence is emerging that propagule pressure determines both the scale of invasion extent and impact (Lockwood et al. 2005; Von Holle and Simberloff 2005).”
- The invasiveness of an introduced species does not predict its impact (2007, background): “Thus, even if there are natural processes linking invasiveness and impact, they may be obscured or overwhelmed by human activities (e.g. Von Holle and Simberloff 2005).”
- Can commercially imported bumble bees out‐compete their native conspecifics? (2006, background): “the propagule pressure, is important for establishment (Lockwood, Cassey & Blackburn 2005; Memmott et al . 2005; Von Holle & Simberloff 2005 ).”
- Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. (2007, result): “These results appear to be consistent with studies linking increased propagule pressure to invasion success [ 11 ], a connection that might be more than just demographic.Intheirreviewofpropagulepressureandinvasion success, Lockwood et al. [12] suggested that the relationship between propagule pressu”
- Are urban systems beneficial, detrimental, or indifferent for biological invasion? (2017, background): “Moreover, the large diversity and population sizes of NIS in urban centres may serve as sources for invasions into nearby natural areas (Colautti et al. 2006; Lockwood et al. 2005; Moreira-Arce et al. 2015; Sullivan et al. 2005; Von Holle and Simberloff 2005).”
- Short‐ and long‐term effects of disturbance and propagule pressure on a biological invasion (2007, background): “A more recent terrestrial experiment also reported that propagule pressure was the primary determinant of invasion success, overwhelming the effects of other factors, such as disturbance and resident diversity, which were concurrently manipulated (Von Holle & Simberloff 2005).”
- The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. (2007, background): “Exotic species are also a highly nonrandom selection of the world’s biota; it is thus likely that ‘‘invasion’’ experiments that use a native invader will differ qualitatively from those using exotic invaders (Von Holle and Simberloff 2005).”
- A unifying framework for biological invasions: the state factor model (2008, background): “…et al. 1990), evolutionary processes (e.g., Blair and Wolfe 2004), biogeographical trends (e.g., Grigulis et al. 2001), propagule pressure (e.g., Ahlroth et al. 2003), as well as the interactions among several factors (e.g., Barney et al. 2005; Chong et al. 2006; Von Holle and Simberloff 2005).”
- Management of invasive plants through ecological resistance (2017, background): “2005; Simberloff 2009) Invasion outcome is largely determined by propagule pressure Propagule pressure overwhelms ecological resistance (Holle and Simberloff 2005) Management of invasive plants through ecological resistance”
- Functional composition controls invasion success in a California serpentine grassland (2010, background): “2003; Fargione & Tilman 2005, 2005), but others have not (Von Holle 2005; Emery 2007). van Ruijven, De Deyn & Berendse (2003) found strong effects of two species in the family Asteraceae on the success of two common invaders (non-exotic) also in this family.”
- Assessing the relative importance of disturbance, herbivory, diversity, and propagule pressure in exotic plant invasion (2009, background): “In the few studies that have considered the role of propagule pressure in invasion success, it was consistently found to be a prevailing factor (Tilman 1997, von Holle and Simberloff 2005, Colautti et al. 2006).”
- Intact forests provide only weak resistance to a shade‐tolerant invasive Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.) (2006, background): “The sapling recruitment model illustrates the potential influence of propagule pressure on invasions; high seed inputs may counteract strong biotic resistance by increasing the odds that some seedlings will survive longer (see Von Holle & Simberloff 2005).”
- Plant invasions along mountain roads: the altitudinal amplitude of alien Asteraceae forbs in their native and introduced ranges (2009, background): “…relationship might also be explained by low propagule pressure (i.e. dispersal limitation) at high altitude, which has emerged as a major determinant of invasion success at both local (Von Holle and Simberloff 2005) and regional (Rouget and Richardson 2003) spatial scales (Colautti et al. 2006).”