Number of Encounters and Experience Quality in Grand Canyon Backcountry: Consistently Negative and Weak Relationships
By W. Stewart, D. Cole. 2001
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c648887789895294c1e340dd4e71839e85409a1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The Mediating Effect of Place Attachment on the Relationship between Festival Satisfaction and Loyalty to the Festival Hosting Destination (2012, background): “Research has also provided evidence indicating that overall visitor satisfaction is an accurate measure of the quality of an experience at parks and wilderness areas (e.g., Stewart and Cole 2001; Tian-Cole, Crompton, and Willson 2002).”
- Generalizing the Encounter--Norm--Crowding Relationship (2002, background): “This article is not likely to resolve the current debate in the literature regarding the usefulness of concepts such as encounters/crowding (Stewart & Cole, 2001) and norms (Cole & Stewart, this issue) to facilitate natural resource management.”
- Crowding as a Descriptive Indicator and an Evaluative Standard: Results from 30 Years of Research (2008, unknown): “E-mail: jerryv@warnercnr.colostate.edu 111 Manning, Lime, Friemund, & Pitt, 1996; Shelby & Heberlein, 1986; Stewart & Cole, 2001).”
- Empirical study of destination loyalty and its antecedent: the perspective of place attachment (2011, background): “Because this domain incorporates several potential threats to the quality of tourism resulting from crowding or conflictsrelated attributes in various settings (Stewart & Cole, 2001).”
- Some Consumer Surplus Estimates for North Carolina Beaches (2005, background): “For example, Stewart and Cole (2001) found that Grand Canyon backpackers were negatively affected by encountering more groups, but the resultant effect was small.”