Comparative Hearing: Birds and Reptiles

By Robert J. Dooling, R. Fay, A. Popper. Springer Handbook of Auditory research, 2000

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c56230ce6f88300f25df669a4a3a462b293c41a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. Timothy F. Wright
2. B. Lohr
3. Robert J. Dooling
4. H. Brumm
5. H. Slabbekoorn

In Ecology

1. Timothy F. Wright
2. B. Lohr
3. Robert J. Dooling
4. Lawrence M. Witmer
5. H. Brumm
6. H. Slabbekoorn

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. B. Lohr
2. Timothy F. Wright
3. Robert J. Dooling
4. H. Slabbekoorn

Citations in the corpus

• Using CT to Peer into the Past: 3D Visualization of the Brain and Ear Regions of Birds, Crocodiles, and Nonavian Dinosaurs (2008, background): “The remarkable hearing capabilities of owls are well known, and their auditory physiology (particularly that of the barn owl, Tyto alba) has been very well studied (see reviews by Dooling et al. 2000; Gleich and Manley 2000; Gleich et al. 2004).”
• Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds: estimating the active space of a signal (2003, methodology): “But even though birds and mammals show similar auditory time constants (Dooling et al. 2000), there is no assurance that this method of estimating signal level is most appropriate for birds.”