Poisoning and Backdooring Contrastive Learning

By Nicholas Carlini, Andreas F. Terzis. 2021

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Multimodal contrastive learning methods like CLIP train on noisy and uncurated training datasets. This is cheaper than labeling datasets manually, and even improves out-of-distribution robustness. We show that this practice makes backdoor and poisoning attacks a significant threat. By poisoning just 0.01% of a dataset (e.g., just 300 images of the 3 million-example Conceptual Captions dataset), we can cause the model to misclassify test images by overlaying a small patch. Targeted poisoning attacks, whereby the model misclassifies a particular test input with an adversarially-desired label, are even easier requiring control of 0.0001% of the dataset (e.g., just three out of the 3 million images). Our attacks call into question whether training on noisy and uncurated Internet scrapes is desirable.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Representation & Self-Supervised Learning, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Percy Liang
  2. Nicholas Carlini
  3. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  4. Dawn Song
  5. Eric Wallace
  6. Florian Tramèr
  7. Quoc V. Le
  8. Jacob Steinhardt

In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning

  1. Nicholas Carlini
  2. Nicolas Papernot
  3. Shutao Xia
  4. Eric Wallace
  5. Jacob Steinhardt
  6. Christopher A. Choquette-Choo
  7. Baoyuan Wu
  8. Neil Zhenqiang Gong

In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

  1. Nicholas Carlini
  2. Florian Tramèr
  3. Nicolas Papernot
  4. Jacob Steinhardt
  5. Dan Hendrycks
  6. Eric Wallace
  7. Dawn Song
  8. Matthias Hein

Citations in the corpus