A phylogenetic analysis of the arachnid orders based on morphological characters
By J. Shultz. 2007
276 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Oceanography, Paleontology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c3bead1c7c36c1e3ab32ebbb04247efcd49ed48
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
In Oceanography
In Paleontology
Citations in the corpus
- Revised systematics of Palaeozoic ‘horseshoe crabs’ and the myth of monophyletic Xiphosura (2013, unknown): “Shultz JW. 2007.”
- FOSSIL CALIBRATIONS FOR THE ARTHROPOD TREE OF LIFE (2016, methodology): “No phylogenetic analysis has yet included all families, but limited taxon sampling has shown monophyly with morphology (Garwood and Dunlop, 2014; Shultz, 2007) and morphology combined with nuclear genes (Giribet et al., 2002; Pepato et al., 2010).”
- Horseshoe crab phylogeny and independent colonizations of fresh water: ecological invasion as a driver for morphological innovation (2016, background): “2015), or including xiphosurans as part of a broader analysis of chelicerate phylogeny (Shultz 2007; Garwood and Dunlop 2014).”
- Functional morphology, ontogeny and evolution of mantis shrimp‐like predators in the Cambrian (2012, background): “8E), the elbow joint is rather conspicuous although the peduncle is very short (this should also be the case in Schizomida, Rowland 1975, figs 7, 8; but see Shultz 2007).”