Methods for Microeconometric Risk and Vulnerability Assessments

2008

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c2749a8dcf18f4ef6f90d2af3e3fa7477ad10ca

Citations in the corpus

• Effect of Financial Inclusion on Poverty and Vulnerability to Poverty: Evidence Using a Multidimensional Measure of Financial Inclusion (2020, unknown): “There are three main econometric approaches to measuring vulnerability: vulnerability as expected poverty, vulnerability as low expected utility, and vulnerability as uninsured exposure to risk (Celidoni and Procidano 2015; Hoddinott and Quisumbing 2010).”
• Assessing household vulnerability to climate change: The case of farmers in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia (2009, unknown): “Vulnerability as uninsured exposure to risk This method is based on as ex post assessment of the extent to which a negative shock causes welfare loss (Hoddinott and Quisumbing 2003). Here, the shock impact is assessed by using panel data to quantify shock-induced changes in consumption. Skoufias (20”
• Social Protection in Sub-Saharan Africa: Getting the Politics Right (2012, unknown): “Poor nutrition, poor health, and limited schooling are associated with low labor productivity that in turn translates into low incomes, which often lead to vicious cycles of poverty and deprivation (see Hoddinott & Quisumbing, 2003).”
• The Impact of Agricultural Technologies on Poverty and Vulnerability of Smallholders in Ethiopia: A Panel Data Analysis (2020, unknown): “According to Hoddinott and Quisumbing (2010), Moser (1998) and Alwang et  al.”
• Measuring Ethiopian farmers' vulnerability to climate change across regional states: (2008, unknown): “One of the disadvantages of this method is that if estimations are made using a single cross section, one must make a strong assumption that cross-sectional variability captures temporal variability (Hoddinott and Quisumbing, 2003).”